WillySteed*ChristineMarie*KolleneSnow*AudienceMember*EdKociela AuthorPlygsAnswersQuestions *JewelryAtGuilt* DickJaneFlipbook*Spoilers*Tweets*RebeccaMusser*My5WivesGreat Stories*BuyTeamKolleenTshirtTodayDon'tMissOut!!!Review!!

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

The Curious Case of Virginia Hill vs the Apostolic United Brethren

An actress from Detroit MI, Virgina Hill was the former wife of a Detroit bookie. She came into a large sum of money - basically liquidation of assets when she divorced her bookie husband, money gifts from former lovers, and money obtained from gambling.

In 1989, she literally took the money and ran to Las Vegas, hiding her savings in the form of small bills in her uncle's home in St George Ut. Her uncle was a polygamist, who belonged to a religious group started by a John Shugart, who just happened to be a former member of the Apostolic United Brethren (AUB). Her uncle introduced her to Shugart, who in turn introduced her to a Daniel Matthews. Matthews attempted to persuade Hill to invest her entire $1.5 million nest egg in a ranch in southern Utah. Hill was told this ranch would be the future home of Shugart's religious group. Hill declined the offer, but she did give Shugart $40,000 to hire a real estate broker to assist him in obtaining the property. 

Hill thought that was the end of the matter, and believed her remaining nest egg remained safe in her uncle's home.Unfortunately, that was not to be the case. Although Shugart and Matthews did hire a John Putvin as their real estate broker, Hill's entire $1.54 million cash nest egg mysteriously disappeared -  stolen from her uncle's home. And according to Shugart, Hill was not the only person flamboozled. 


You see, Matthews was not actually a convert to Shugart's fledgling polygamist group, but rather, was still an active member of the AUB. According to Shugart, instead of Matthews and Putvin using the $1.54 million cash to purchase the ranch, the men put the cash in cans and delivered those cans to Owen Allred, who was, at that time, the leader of the AUB. To add insult to injury, the money was then used to pay off property owned by the AUB, and to purchase a car lot in Salt Lake County and a vehicle among other things.

Because of the convoluted transactions, it took Hill (assisted by former members of the AUB who had knowledge of what happened) until 1994 to discovered what really happened to her money. But by that time, the statute of limitations (four years for fraud) had already run out.

In 1998, 4th District Judge Anthony Schofield dismissed Hill's lawsuit, ruling "I find that Hill did not act reasonably...She was on notice that her money was gone and she knew at least some of the responsible parties. Yet she did nothing for 7 1/2 years." Hill protested that she had no idea what had happened to her money, until she was contacted in 1994 by former AUB members. In 2001, the Utah Supreme Court agreed with Hill, ruling that "...accrual of the cause of action is not complete until discovery of the pertinent facts." In other words, Hill was within the statute of limitations when she filed her lawsuit in 1995 - approximately one year after she finally was able to discover what happened to her money.

In 2003, Hill finally won her lawsuit, and was awarded $1.54 million plus over $1.8 million in interest. Owen Allred was ordered to pay damages of $30,000 to Hill - an amount acknowledging Allred's role in the sordid affair as it represented the $30,000 cash tithing he accepted from and later transferred back to co-defendant Putvin in the form of a cashiers check, as a means to launder Hill's money. Lamoine Jensen (who succeeded Allred as leader of the AUB) was also fined $30,000. The AUB was ordered to pay $250,000. AUB member James Sandmire (who owned the car lot purchased using Hill's money) was found liable for $500,000. Matthews and Putvin were ordered to pay the remaining balance of the judgement. 

Another judge, however, felt that Hill had "unclean hands" because she couldn't prove she obtained her $1.54 million legally, and reduced the judgement to her original nest egg of $1.54 million. Hill appealed that decision, and in 2009, the Utah Supreme agreed with her, stating that it didn't matter how she obtained the $1.54 million and that she was entitled to seek more than the $1.54 million she originally lost.

Written by Cynical Jinx

References:


actress-says.html




21 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You mean the Allreds are the perfect polygamy group? I am Shocked! Outraged! I thought they were "THE" ones! LOL

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sadly, I think many churches have strange financial affairs; however, it seems very common with this group.
    So who exactly stole it? Matthews?

    ReplyDelete
  4. So Owen did what now, pretended some of it was a tithing, and then turned it back over? I got confused.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dirty Deeds...Done Dirt Cheap

    ReplyDelete
  6. Crazy Cookie asked: So Owen did what now, pretended some of it was a tithing, and then turned it back over?

    Yep, he supposedly accepted $30K in cash as a tithing from Putvin, but then returned it in the form of a $30K cashiers check back to Putvin. That's money laundering.

    ----------------------------
    Jan-Tine asked:
    So who exactly stole it? Matthews?

    Appears Matthews and Putvin were judged responsible for stealing Hill's money.

    ----------------------------

    The newspaper article written in 2009 (Woman Can Seek More Money From Sect) gives a slightly different spin on what happened to Hill's money, and her involvement. It's very interesting reading, and does not paint a pretty picture of the men running the AUB and why John Shugart left the AUB.

    Thanks for the comments and questions, everyone!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Boy, those are some real prophets for you! Did they have a "Vision" to take the money? lol

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sooo interesting to read this, then see him up on the tape blubbering like a baby that he was doing a favor by taking women in....looks can be so deceiving. And, you have to think, Christine has learned from all of this...
    GREAT Article, CJ!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Mathews name is Dennis not Daniel. Shugart never appeared on the stand for his part in all of this. AUB members were asked to dip into their own pockets to pay the money back, in order to avoid losing their homes in communities owned by AUB trust. What a mess.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Now, Kody owned their own home, do the others have to give everything to the AUB? I'm confused.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thank you FreeAndClear for the correction on Matthews first name!

    ReplyDelete
  12. The most faithful members are part of communities called "United Orders" Usually the land is owned by AUB and members build their houses on the understanding that those houses belong to AUB. Not everyone in AUB belongs to an order. There are orders in Utah at Rocky Ridge, Harvest Haven (which is near Eagle Mountain, west of Lehi) and a new community being built out at Mount Pleasant. Pinesdale, Montana was a United Order, but I think it is falling apart and people going their own way. Kody obviously want to keep control of what he has.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Smart there... I'd say that's a Janelle call.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thanks for the background on this case.

    This shows the true nature of these greedy guys.

    And boy look out, if the LeBaron group knew they had this cash it would have been like the wild west!

    Oh wait it already is...

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yes, it was a great post, Cynical Jinx! She's one good writer!

    ReplyDelete
  16. It's like they are a Mafia, think about it. Or, a Amway pyramid scam

    ReplyDelete
  17. So on the Trib I bring this suit up to slam the AUB and all the people sheeple who think they are so nice...

    The judgement has grown to over 6 million.... some posters say they finally paid it - I dont believe it for one minute!

    ReplyDelete
  18. I would really like to see Cynical Jinx get back to writing more in depth pieces about polygamy. You do a great job, honey, and should write a new one. Seems you know a lot about it, and should educate us more.

    ReplyDelete